Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 23rd November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Scargill to address to St Helens Remploy protest meeting



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 October 2008
Former miner's union leader Arthur Scargill is to speak on the plight of St Helens' axed Remploy workers at a public meeting in the town.
A host of other leading union figures are also due to attend the meeting at St Thomas' Church in Westfield Street on Wednesday night (October 15).

Remploy's flagship St Helens factory closed in April. But the Lea Green site – which once employed 230 workers – still has a skeleton staff using the factory to help them hunt for new jobs. All production officially ended on Friday, March 14.

Nearly 200 workers have accepted redundancy packages and 44 remain on the Remploy payroll as they continue to look for work in mainstream employment.

Scargill, who quit as leader of the National Miners Union in 2000, remains one of the most divisive figures in British politics.

Revered and reviled in equal measures for his role in the 1984 miners' strike, he formed the Socialist Labour Party shortly after leaving the union movement.

Other speakers are expected to be Phil Davies, the National Secretary of the GMB union and Ron Waugh, the union's manufacturing section president.

The £12.5million factory was first opened by Princess Anne in February 2005 and was heralded as a leader in employment for the disabled. But just three years it was named as one the Remploy sites to shut following a cost-cutting report by the company.

The full article contains 242 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 October 2008 9:09 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: St Helens
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Cliffordian,

Rainhill 13/10/2008 19:40:03
Where has this story come from ? I am a official in the Remploy St Helens branch of the GMB and we know nothing !!!! about this meeting , as for Phil Davies attending as far as I know he has a meeting in London that day !! Maybe you should have checked with the people who are involved - still ! with the fight.
2

Harrywantswork,

Manchester 13/10/2008 20:32:44
Come on Ian, I thought you would know the drill by now!

This kind of meeting is not for us ex-employees to raise our concerns and tell of our experiences. There will be no room for us.

Its an opportunity for the local lefties to get together to patronise us with warm fluffy words and massage each others egos while doing nothing that actually helps us in our struggle.

It is interesting to read that all production officially ended on Friday, March 14. We all know the truth!



3

J-Mac,

13/10/2008 23:27:21
The meeting has been advertised on the SLP website for some time. As I understand it the meeting is jointly hosted by the SLP and the GMB hence the fact that two senior GMB officials are speaking alongside Arthur Scargill whose record of defending jobs is second to none.

Harry, why don't you go along and raise your concerns? You don't get the opportunity everyday to speak face to face with senior Trades Union officials. Maybe you've got some ideas that could be taken up?
4

Let Down!,

St Helens 14/10/2008 18:39:19
Will Mr Scargill actually be attending this one. He didnt turn up last year at the town hall when we were still fighting to keep the factory from closure. Who are the leading union figures attending in person?

Also there is no Remploy skeleton staff still at the factory. This has been taken over by Mc Brides, doing the same work and same orders as we were. Funny how they can make a go of it isnt it??
5

Harrywantswork,

Manchester 15/10/2008 08:49:36
Hi J-Mac, I didn't get up on Monday morning and decide to be cynical!

The fact that the meeting was advertised on the SLP website is nothing but a poor excuse for lack of communication and consideration. Many ex factory employees have faced barriers to communication relating from disability. Withdrawal of the support offered in the factory has compounded the problem.

Even local branch officials were unaware of this meeting. Can we realistically expect ex employees to surf the internet (those that have it)on the off chance that they stumble upon an announcement!

As is pointed out by "Let Down", Mr Scargill had an opportunity to lend his support to our struggle before we actually lost our jobs. The words stable door, horse and bolted spring immediately to mind.
6

Dannn,

15/10/2008 10:34:44
Can't agree more with Harrywantswork. What's the point in Scargill turning up now. The jobs have been lost. The factory has shut. What are Scargill and his union mates trying to achieve by turning up so long after the event?
7

Donald,

Liverpool 15/10/2008 11:00:53
The local MPs should have also be invited to speak, to explain why their party agreed the closures. They were very quick to assist the banking systems.
8

J-Mac,

15/10/2008 13:48:54
Fair enough Harry, your criticisms stand up - except for your last paragraph. I still think if you can manage along you should go to the meeting and make your points to see what reaction you get.

I stand by Arthur though. People can disagree with him but his record and integrity are beyond reproach.
9

Harrywantswork,

Manchester 15/10/2008 18:39:03
Hi J-Mac

Im sorry but personal circumstances prevent me from attending.

Please be assured that I do not have anything against Mr Scargill personally and I respect your opinion.

My only issues were timing, lack of communication and the fact that those who are affected most appear to have been an after thought.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.